Why #BoycottIndVsPak Is Trending: Outrage, Victims’ Families & Political Leaders React to Asia Cup 2025 Match

—

by

Himanshu
in

The upcoming India vs Pakistan match in the Asia Cup 2025 is stirring more than cricketing excitement—it has sparked moral, emotional, and political firestorms. With the Pahalgam terror attack fresh in public memory and subsequent Operation Sindoor, many Indians feel the match is insensitive, a betrayal of national sentiment. Below are the vivid reactions, criticisms, counterpoints, and larger reflections being voiced across the country.

Key Incidents & Voices

1. Victims’ Families Speak Out

  • Aishanya Dwivedi, widow of businessman Shubham Dwivedi (killed in the Pahalgam attack), called the match an “insult” to those who lost their lives. She asked how India could normalize playing Pakistan “when our people bled” and declared she would not watch. The Times of India
  • Asavari Jagdale, whose father was one of the Pahalgam victims, said: “It is very shameful. It has not even been six months since the Pahalgam incident. Operation Sindoor took place after that… I feel bad that despite all this, they have no shame in organising this match.” India Today
    She added her family was “shattered” and urged Prime Minister Modi to reconsider. India Today

2. Former Cricketers & Public Personalities

  • Manoj Tiwary, ex-cricketer and current politician, said he would personally boycott the game. “I am boycotting the Asia Cup personally. I don’t like to see it … because of the kind of environment it has been in, and where people have died.” Outlook India
  • Harbhajan Singh asked, “Khoon aur paani ek saath nahi beh sakte … Why do we give them so much importance?”
    He expressed that when soldiers are dying, talking about cricket feels trivial. The Times of India+1
  • Kapil Dev urged for calm. He said players should focus on playing and not let political tensions dominate the narrative. India Today

3. Political Leaders & Symbolic Protests

  • Uddhav Thackeray criticized the government saying the wounds from Pahalgam have not healed. “Blood and water cannot flow together … If there are soldiers dying, and we still play cricket, then what message does it send?” India Today
  • Asaduddin Owaisi condemned “those who talk about patriotism,” saying they should ask whether they can back it up. He said: “Chullu bhar paani mein doob maro” — essentially accusing some political leaders of hypocrisy. Navbharat Times
  • Manoj Tiwari (BJP) defended participation, saying it’s “a matter of following tournament rules” and that in multilateral tournaments, skipping matches means disqualification. The Times of India

4. Bollywood, Social Media & General Public Sentiment

  • Raveena Tandon hoped the team would wear black armbands and observe a moment of silence, “Before victory …” as a gesture of respect. mint
  • Many fans are outraged by promos. One user tweeted: “Terror and entertainment cannot go together.”
    Others accused broadcasters (and Virender Sehwag, who featured in promos) of profiteering off the rivalry. Cricket Times+1
  • Hashtags like #BoycottIndiaVsPak, #BoycottAsiaCup, #DefeatPakistanInEveryField trended heavily. The sentiment: if sport presumes to heal or normalize too early, it discounts real loss. India Today+2India Today+2

Descriptions of the Mood

  • Grief mixed with frustration: Many from affected families feel that holding such a high-profile match so soon is like turning the page before ink has dried.
  • Moral conflict among fans: Some say they love the game but can’t bring themselves to cheer; they feel supporting the match is overlooking justice.
  • Political polarization: Parties are sharply divided. Some see protesting the match as a moral duty; others view sports as escapism and argue that skipping matches isolates India in multilateral contexts.
  • Symbolic protests: Collection of sindoor (vermilion) from households by Shiv Sena (UBT) as a protest, effigies burnt by AAP workers for those who screen the match live, clubs/restaurants urged not to telecast. myKhel+1

Arguments from Those Defending or Explaining Participation

  • Former players like Sunil Gavaskar emphasised that players & BCCI are following government directives. The decision is beyond players’ control. India Today
  • BJP leaders maintain that India doesn’t play bilateral cricket with Pakistan, but in multilateral tournaments (like Asia Cup), rules mandate fixtures; skipping could lead to forfeits. The Times of India
  • Some believe sporting engagements should be separate from politics; sport can be a bridge rather than a wedge. Others caution against letting emotional pulses dictate long-term policy.

Why Emotions Are Particularly Intense This Time

  1. Recency of tragedy: The Pahalgam attack (April 2025) is recent; for many, wounds are still raw.
  2. Operation Sindoor: India’s military response adds context; many feel support for the match feels like glossing over that.
  3. Media intensification: Promos, social media chatter, and coverage seem insensitive in the eyes of many — perceived as celebrating a rivalry without acknowledging current loss.
  4. High stakes of symbolism: India vs Pakistan matches have always carried more than sport — national pride, historical animosities, identity politics. When combined with recent events, match becomes a moral statement in itself, not just entertainment.

Final Reflection

The India vs Pakistan Asia Cup match has become more than a game—it is a mirror reflecting grief, nationalism, public policy, ethics, and media responsibility. For many, cheering feels like silence, not support. For others, skipping the match might not be enough to make a statement.

What is clear: there is no consensus. Some feel internal betrayal by institutions; others believe sports must go on regardless. What this moment underscores is that in India, at least right now, sport cannot and will not be separated from politics or tragedy.

Possible Paths Forward

  • A moment of silence or symbolic tribute by players or broadcasters.
  • Transparent communication from BCCI and government about why the match is going forward, acknowledging victims.
  • Encouraging respectful observance by fans who feel emotionally conflicted.
  • Considering deferring or relocating fixtures in extreme cases of public sentiment.

Disclaimer: The quotes, opinions, and descriptions included above are based on publicly available statements, news reports, and social media posts. They reflect the views of those individuals and sections of the public. This article aims to present a rounded picture of the sentiment around the match; it does not endorse or oppose any position.