Tommy Robinson’s Stance on Indians Amid Anti-Immigration Protests in London

—

by

Himanshu
in

Anti-immigration protests have become a recurring feature in Britain’s political landscape. One of the most polarizing figures in this arena is Tommy Robinson, the former leader of the English Defence League. Known for his harsh rhetoric against Muslim communities and his campaigns against immigration, Robinson has also made headlines for his strikingly different tone toward Indians — particularly British Hindus.

This article explores what Robinson has said about Indians, how it contrasts with his broader anti-immigrant stance, and what it reveals about the emerging alliances between segments of the European far-right and Hindu nationalist groups.

1. Background: Tommy Robinson and the Anti-Immigration Movement

Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) rose to prominence as the founder of the English Defence League, a group that claimed to combat “Islamic extremism” but soon became associated with street protests and anti-Muslim sentiment.

Over the years he has positioned himself as a “whistle-blower” on immigration, grooming gangs, and cultural change in Britain. However, mainstream political parties and many commentators have labelled him an extremist.

His Signature Themes

ThemeDescription
Opposition to mass immigrationClaims that Britain’s culture and safety are threatened by uncontrolled migration.
Anti-Muslim rhetoricFocuses heavily on “Islamic extremism” and blames Muslims collectively.
Framing of ‘victims’Portrays certain groups (white working-class, Hindus) as under siege.

2. A Surprisingly Warm View of Indians

In sharp contrast to his treatment of other immigrant communities, Robinson has consistently praised Indians, especially Hindus. He has described them as a “peaceful, peace-loving migrant community” and commended their integration into British society.

Key Statements He Has Made About Indians

YearStatementContext
2019Praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s election as a “populist revolution”Social media posts during Indian elections
2022Offered to mobilise “hundreds of men” to protect British Hindus during local tensionsInterview after Leicester disturbances
2023-24Repeatedly emphasised that Hindus are “model migrants”Speeches at rallies and podcasts

These statements are notable because they deviate from his usual anti-immigrant tone.

3. Why This Matters: Strategic Alliance Building

3.1 Differentiating “Good” and “Bad” Immigrants

Robinson’s rhetoric suggests a narrative where some minorities are “acceptable” and others “problematic.” By elevating Hindus as a model community, he can argue that his movement is not racist, but rather about “values” or “integration.”

3.2 Far-Right and Hindutva Connections

European far-right movements have increasingly echoed themes popular with India’s Hindu nationalist ecosystem — such as “Hinduphobia,” the idea that Hindus face systemic discrimination. Robinson has leveraged these ideas to position himself as an ally of British Hindus against Muslims.

This alignment is not just rhetorical. Some far-right actors in Europe have shared platforms with Hindu nationalist activists online, amplifying each other’s narratives.

4. The Leicester Case: A Turning Point

The Leicester disturbances in 2022, where Hindu and Muslim youth clashed after a cricket match, became a flashpoint. Robinson quickly sided with the Hindu community, offering support and claiming they were victims of aggression.

This incident allowed him to reinforce his “protector” image for Hindus while demonising Muslims. It also deepened the divide between communities that had lived side by side for decades.

5. Community Reactions

British Hindus

Some welcomed the support, feeling that mainstream media ignored their concerns. Others, however, warned that Robinson’s embrace was tactical and could drag Hindus into far-right politics.

British Muslims

Many viewed Robinson’s statements as another attempt to stigmatise them. They argued that he uses “Hinduphobia” as a wedge to justify Islamophobia.

Broader Society

Journalists and analysts have noted that these dynamics mirror global trends where right-wing populists build coalitions by selectively praising some minority groups while vilifying others.

6. Implications for the UK and Beyond

AspectImplication
Social cohesionSelective praise risks deepening divisions between communities.
Political discourseFar-right actors gain legitimacy by claiming alliances with “model minorities.”
Global influenceShows how India’s domestic politics can shape diaspora narratives abroad.

7. Why Robinson’s Remarks on Indians Should Be Read Carefully

Although Robinson’s positive statements about Indians may sound flattering, they can also be seen as part of a wider strategy:

  • Tokenism – Highlighting one minority to attack another.
  • Divide and rule – Pitting communities against each other.
  • Legitimacy building – Portraying himself as “not racist” but a defender of certain values.

Recognising these patterns is important for communities to avoid being instrumentalised.

8. The Larger Trend: Global Right-Wing Populism

Robinson’s posture fits into a broader international pattern where far-right figures find common ground with nationalist movements abroad:

  • US alt-right figures praising Hindu nationalism.
  • European identitarian groups sharing Hindutva content.
  • Digital networks promoting “civilizational” clashes between Islam and others.

These alliances are transactional. They help far-right groups appear multicultural while advancing exclusionary politics.

9. How Indian Diaspora Communities Can Respond

  • Stay informed about who is speaking “for” you.
  • Promote interfaith dialogue to avoid being drawn into polarising narratives.
  • Call out selective alliances that pit one group against another.
  • Highlight shared values of peace and cooperation beyond religious boundaries.

By doing so, Indian communities in Britain can protect their reputation without becoming pawns in far-right strategies.

10. Conclusion

Tommy Robinson’s praise for Indians is not just a curious footnote. It reveals a deliberate tactic: to construct a narrative of “good immigrants” versus “bad immigrants” and to forge alliances that legitimise far-right politics.

For Indians in the UK and globally, understanding this dynamic is crucial. Accepting praise without scrutiny can entangle communities in agendas that ultimately harm social cohesion. A truly inclusive society requires rejecting divisive politics, even when it comes wrapped in compliments.

Disclaimer

This article is based on publicly reported information and aims to provide an analytical overview. It does not endorse any political figure or movement and does not reflect the personal views of the author. Readers are encouraged to consult multiple perspectives before forming conclusions.