Nepal Political Crisis 2025: Gen Z Protests, Interim Government, and Unanswered Questions

Sep 11, 2025

—

Nepal is in the midst of an unprecedented political upheaval. The recent wave of youth-led protests, largely attributed to Gen Z, has shaken the political establishment, resulting in the resignation of the sitting Prime Minister and the withdrawal of high-profile figures from interim leadership consideration. Amid the chaos, Kulman Ghising, a technocrat renowned for his efficiency and clean image, has emerged as the likely frontrunner to lead an interim government.

While the protests are being hailed as a victory for youth activism, the precision, organization, and strategic targeting of political figures raise questions about possible external influence and orchestrated planning behind the scenes.

Backdrop of the Crisis

Cause: Widespread dissatisfaction with corruption, nepotism, and restrictive policies, such as social media bans, ignited mass demonstrations.
Scale: Tens of thousands of young protesters filled the streets, leading to clashes with security forces. Dozens were killed, hundreds injured, and property damage ensued.
Government Response: The Prime Minister resigned, the army intervened to maintain order, and negotiations began to appoint an interim administration acceptable to the protesters.

Key Players in the Transition

Name	Background	Current Status in Interim Govt Selection
Kulman Ghising	Former head of the Nepal Electricity Authority; known for ending chronic power outages and improving infrastructure.	Emerging as the consensus choice for interim leadership.
Sushila Karki	Nepal’s first female Chief Justice; respected for her judicial integrity and anti-corruption stance.	Withdrew due to constitutional and eligibility issues.
Balen Shah	Popular Kathmandu mayor, engineer, and rapper; celebrated by young voters.	Stepped back from national leadership to continue as mayor.

Timeline of Events

Date	Event
Early 2025	Controversial social media regulations spark student protests.
April-May 2025	Gen Z-led protests escalate nationwide; clashes with security forces begin.
June 2025	Prime Minister announces resignation amid growing unrest.
July 2025	Sushila Karki and Balen Shah publicly withdraw from interim leadership contention.
August 2025	Consensus builds around Kulman Ghising as the interim government candidate.
September 2025	Discussions continue among protest leaders, army, and presidency to finalize leadership and election roadmap.

Why Kulman Ghising Emerged as Front-Runner

Proven Track Record: Credited with eliminating widespread power cuts and improving utility management.
Non-Political Persona: Seen as a neutral technocrat acceptable to multiple factions.
Youth Support: Endorsed by protest leaders as someone capable of delivering results without political bias.

The Role of Gen Z in Nepal’s Politics

While media coverage frequently references “Gen Z” as the driver of change, it’s crucial to understand their real capacity:

Who They Are: Individuals born mid-1990s to early-2010s, mostly students and young professionals.
Influence: They cannot legally appoint governments. Their power lies in protests, public pressure, and social media mobilization.
Organization: The movement shows precise coordination, targeted criticism of specific leaders, and strategic messaging—raising questions about whether this was purely organic or backed by external interests.

Myth vs. Reality: Gen Z Movement

Myth	Reality
Gen Z can form a government	They can only influence public opinion; formal appointment requires constitutional authority.
They are a formal organization	Gen Z is a demographic label; protests are spontaneous, coordinated online, not a registered political party.
Their actions are entirely organic	Coordination, timing, and targeting suggest careful planning. External actors could potentially amplify impact.
They act without oversight	Constitutional processes still govern appointments; protests pressure, but do not legally authorize.

Key Demands of the Protest Movement

Demand	Description
End Corruption	Transparent governance, audits of public projects, anti-graft measures.
Youth Representation	Inclusion in policymaking and interim governance.
Economic Reform	Job creation, equitable opportunities, and better public services.
Digital Freedom	Reversal of restrictive online regulations.
Roadmap for Elections	Clear timelines for free and fair elections under interim leadership.

Questions That Remain

While the protests appear grassroots, several aspects are noteworthy:

Precision in Targeting: Specific leaders were quickly identified and strategically pressured.
Planning: The movement’s timing and coordination suggest advanced preparation, not just spontaneous outrage.
External Influence?: Could international organizations, foreign governments, or other interest groups be amplifying or guiding the movement?
Future Stability: Will the interim government meet public expectations, or is this a controlled reshuffling of elites?

Potential Impact on Nepal’s Future

Positive Outcome: If the interim government delivers results, it could establish a precedent for technocratic, transparent governance and increase youth participation in politics.
Risks: Failure to deliver or perceived manipulation could lead to renewed unrest or loss of trust in institutions.

Conclusion

Nepal’s 2025 political crisis is a pivotal moment in the country’s history. While the youth-led movement has successfully pressured the political establishment, the precision, planning, and rapid consolidation of support for Kulman Ghising raise valid questions about potential external influence and strategic orchestration. Whether this marks the beginning of true reform or another elite-controlled transition remains to be seen.

The coming months will determine if Nepal can turn youth activism into genuine political change—or if the protest wave will be absorbed into the existing power structures.