Nepal Bans 26 Social Media Platforms in 2025: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube Blocked | Full List & Impact

—

by

Himanshu
in ,

In a surprising move, the government of Nepal has banned 26 social media platforms, including some of the most widely used global apps like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, WhatsApp, and X (formerly Twitter). The decision has created a massive digital disruption in the country, raising debates about regulation vs. freedom of expression.

This ban is not just about blocking access—it’s about Nepal’s attempt to enforce local accountability, protect user rights, and regulate online activities. Let’s explore the full story, reasons, affected platforms, and the impact of this decision.

📌 Why Did Nepal Ban 26 Social Media Platforms?

The main reason behind the ban is non-compliance with local laws. The government had recently issued a mandate requiring all social media companies to:

  • Register with the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology.
  • Appoint a local representative or liaison office in Nepal.
  • Set up a grievance redressal mechanism for user complaints.
  • Adhere to the Directive on Regulating the Use of Social Media, 2023.

Since many companies failed to comply within the deadline, the government instructed telecom operators and ISPs to block them.

🚫 Platforms Blocked vs. Platforms Still Allowed

StatusPlatforms
Blocked (26 total)Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, WhatsApp, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Reddit, Pinterest, Discord, Snapchat, Signal, Threads, WeChat, Quora, Tumblr, Clubhouse, Mastodon, Rumble, VK, Line, IMO, Zalo, Soul, Hamro Patro (partial), and more
Allowed / Under ReviewTikTok, Viber, WeTalk, Nimbuzz, Poppo Live, Telegram (review stage), Global Diary (review stage)

⚖️ Legal & Policy Background

This move is backed by the Supreme Court directive urging the government to regulate online platforms more strictly. The upcoming Social Media Bill 2081 is also expected to:

  • Impose hefty fines for non-compliance.
  • Enable criminal action against violators.
  • Create a framework for content moderation and user protection.

📉 Impact of the Ban

The ban has widespread implications across Nepal’s society and economy:

1. Telecom Companies

  • Nearly 50% of internet traffic in Nepal comes from social media apps.
  • Telecoms fear a drop in data usage and revenues.

2. Businesses & Startups

  • Thousands of SMEs and digital entrepreneurs rely on Facebook Ads, Instagram Reels, and YouTube marketing.
  • E-commerce businesses are facing customer outreach challenges.

3. Influencers & Content Creators

  • Influencers have lost access to their audiences.
  • Many are shifting to TikTok and Viber, which remain operational.

4. Public & Civil Rights

  • Citizens are protesting the ban as a violation of freedom of speech and access to information.
  • Human rights activists fear this sets a precedent for digital censorship.

🌍 Global Context

Nepal is not the first country to regulate social media platforms.

CountryApproach to Regulation
IndiaIT Rules 2021 requiring grievance officers and compliance with takedown orders
ChinaStrict censorship with only state-approved platforms allowed
EUDigital Services Act (DSA) enforcing strong accountability and data protection
NepalMandatory registration, local presence, and grievance system

This shows Nepal is following a global trend, but its blanket ban is considered harsher than most democracies.

🔮 What’s Next for Nepal?

  • Platforms may return if they register and comply with regulations.
  • Citizens are likely to use VPNs to bypass restrictions.
  • The Social Media Bill 2081 will further clarify future rules.
  • Local apps could see a rise in popularity, filling the void left by global giants.

✅ Conclusion

The ban on 26 social media platforms in Nepal marks a turning point in digital governance. While the government argues it is about accountability and user safety, critics see it as censorship and control.

Whether this decision empowers Nepal’s digital ecosystem or weakens its democratic values will depend on how fairly the laws are implemented and whether a balance is struck between regulation and freedom.