NCERT Textbook Controversies: What’s Changing and Why It Matters

Education is never just about learning facts; it’s about shaping how young minds understand the world around them. In India, this idea is at the forefront of debates surrounding the recent changes in NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) textbooks. From renaming books with culturally rooted titles to removing or revising chapters on the Mughal dynasty and Delhi Sultanate, these changes have sparked widespread discussion on education, ideology, and identity.


New Names, New Identity

One of the most visible changes has been the introduction of new, culturally inspired titles. Books now come with names such as Mridang, Ganit Prakash, and Poorvi. These terms draw from India’s traditional heritage—musical instruments, ragas, and indigenous knowledge systems.

The intention, as explained under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and National Curriculum Framework 2023, is to “decolonize” the curriculum and give students a stronger sense of cultural belonging. Proponents argue this move is essential to instill pride in Indian traditions. Critics, however, caution that such naming may not reflect the diversity of India and could impose cultural symbols not equally familiar to all regions.


History Rewritten?

Another significant area of controversy is the removal of chapters related to the Mughal dynasty and Delhi Sultanate in middle-school history books. Instead, there is a greater emphasis on ancient Indian dynasties, indigenous scientific traditions, and spiritual geography.

According to NCERT officials, this is part of a broader “rationalization process” aimed at reducing curriculum overload and avoiding content duplication—an effort that began during the pandemic. Yet, critics argue that this risks oversimplifying or even distorting India’s diverse history, depriving students of a fuller understanding of the nation’s past.


Why It Matters

These changes go far beyond the pages of a textbook. They raise important questions about the role of education:

  • Should textbooks highlight national pride and cultural heritage, or should they prioritize balanced representation of all historical eras?
  • Can the process of decolonizing the curriculum strengthen identity, or might it inadvertently limit exposure to India’s pluralistic history?
  • What long-term impact will these shifts have on students preparing for competitive exams, higher studies, and global engagement?

For parents, teachers, and policymakers, the debate underscores the enormous power that curriculum decisions hold in shaping young minds.


Conclusion

The NCERT textbook revisions are not just academic adjustments—they are reflections of India’s evolving educational philosophy and political climate. Whether viewed as necessary corrections or controversial omissions, these changes will influence how an entire generation sees India’s past, present, and future.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It summarizes ongoing debates around NCERT textbooks without taking a political or ideological position. For official updates, readers should consult NCERT and Ministry of Education announcements.