Your cart is currently empty!
KP Sharma Oli’s Anti-India Stance? How Nepal’s Ex-PM Rewrote the Country’s Geopolitics With China
KP Sharma Oli, Nepal’s former Prime Minister and a senior leader of the Communist Party of Nepal (UML), is one of the most debated figures in South Asian politics. Often portrayed as a nationalist at home, he is also widely criticised by opponents and Indian media for adopting an “anti-India” posture while deepening ties with China. His tenure reshaped Nepal’s foreign policy and left a legacy of both opportunities and challenges.
Oli’s Rise and the Nationalist Narrative
Oli built his political base on a platform of sovereignty, national dignity and resistance to external pressure. This narrative resonated with many Nepali voters, especially after long-standing political instability and perceived Indian interference in domestic affairs.
Strength | Description | Political Impact |
---|---|---|
Nationalist Branding | Repeated emphasis on Nepal’s independent foreign policy | Gained support among young voters |
Border Maps Issue | Promulgation of new Nepal map including disputed territories | Seen as standing up to India |
Consolidation of Left Parties | Unified Communist factions to form a powerful bloc | Secured parliamentary majority |
India–Nepal Relations Under Oli: The “Anti-India” Perception
During Oli’s tenure, relations with India became strained on multiple fronts:
- Territorial Disputes: His government published a new political map claiming Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura areas, sparking diplomatic protests from India.
- Transit & Trade: Steps to reduce reliance on Indian ports were taken, such as agreements with Chinese ports.
- Rhetoric: Critics in India saw his speeches as confrontational, while Oli insisted they were about safeguarding Nepal’s sovereignty.
Issue | Oli’s Action | Resulting Perception |
---|---|---|
Border Dispute | Issued new map, passed through Parliament | “Anti-India” label in Indian media |
Transit Agreements | Shifted trade routes toward China | Reduced dependence on India |
Political Messaging | Assertive statements on sovereignty | Popular at home, controversial abroad |
Pivot Toward China: Strategic or Overdependence?
Oli’s government signed multiple agreements with Beijing under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This included plans for rail links, highways and cross-border energy trade.
Area of Cooperation | Project Highlights | Reactions in Nepal |
---|---|---|
Infrastructure | Railway from Tibet to Kathmandu (feasibility studies) | Seen as game-changer but slow progress |
Trade & Transit | Use of Chinese seaports and dry ports | Diversification applauded by some |
Investments | Telecom, energy, and hydropower partnerships | Concerns about debt and sovereignty |
Opponents accused Oli of tilting too far toward China, risking Nepal’s balanced foreign policy. Supporters argued he was merely diversifying Nepal’s options.
Governance and Allegations
Domestically, Oli’s government faced criticism for frequent dissolution of Parliament, mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic, and allegations of corruption or favouritism in large infrastructure contracts. None of these have been legally proven, but they became major talking points in Nepal’s media.
Allegation / Criticism | Impact on Nepal |
---|---|
Centralising Power | Triggered constitutional crises, weakened Parliament |
Cronyism / Corruption Allegations | Eroded public trust, though denied by his party |
COVID-19 Handling | Perception of poor preparedness & response |
Nepal’s Current Situation: After Oli
- Political Instability: Multiple government changes and party splits have followed.
- Economic Pressures: Inflation, unemployment, and rising debt continue to challenge the country.
- Foreign Policy Tightrope: Nepal is still trying to balance relations with both India and China without appearing biased.
Conclusion
KP Sharma Oli remains a polarising figure in Nepal. His tenure is marked by bold decisions that appealed to nationalist sentiment but strained ties with India and brought Nepal closer to China. Whether this strategy will benefit Nepal in the long run or deepen its dependency on external powers is still debated. Future leaders will have to navigate these complex dynamics with greater finesse.